From the Associated Press yesterday,
The federal government is suing KBR Inc., the largest military contractor in Iraq, over what prosecutors say were improper charges to the Army for private security services. The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Washington, charges that KBR knew it could not bill the government for private armed security for the company and 33 of its subcontractors, but did so anyway.
This is an old issue that was long buried and ignored: that some, if not much, of the money spent on private security in Iraq was illegal. The reality of security contractors, despite the claims of so many that they are inherently outside the law, is they have always been potentially liable if the client, in this case the US Government, chose to make them so. Ultimately, their impact on the struggle in Iraq was significant. For all the talk on the importance of rebuilding and the invocation of the Marshall Plan, it would have been hard to come up with better methods of so-called ‘development’ to alienate the people more.
- American mercenaries of public diplomacy
- Beyond Government Accountability: a challenging look at Peacekeepers
- Warnings Unheeded On Guards In Iraq
- The Cost of Keeping the Principal off the X
- IED as a Weapon of Strategic Influence: Creating the Blackwater Nightmare
- The Intended 'Psychological By-Products' of Development